How State Wildlife Agencies Are Funded, and What It Means for Deer Hunters

December 10, 2024 By: Catherine Appling-Pooler

As deer hunters, we have a direct stake in how our state wildlife agencies are funded. These agencies play a crucial role in managing wildlife populations, protecting habitats, and promoting sustainable hunting practices. However, recent attempts in several states to redirect wildlife funds to general budgets could jeopardize conservation efforts. Understanding how these agencies are financed is vital for ensuring that our hunting and conservation efforts continue to thrive.

For example, earlier this year, Nebraska’s Governor Jim Pillen launched the “Clean Out the Closet” initiative, aimed at consolidating funds that state agencies had “hoarded” and redirecting them to a general fund. This move threatens the critical funding for wildlife conservation. Unfortunately, Nebraska is not alone—similar proposals are popping up across the country, including Pennsylvania’s HB 1300, which sought to divert $150 million from the state’s Game Fund to its Clean Streams Fund. When state lawmakers divert wildlife dollars, they also risk losing federal conservation funds, which further threatens our ability to conserve wildlife and habitat.

Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen’s “Clean Out the Close Initiative” could potentially take funds designated for the state wildlife agency and move it to a general fund for all potential uses. Other states are considering similar moves.

In light of these attacks on conservation funding, it’s more important than ever for us as deer hunters to stay informed about state legislation and educate lawmakers about the importance of properly funding wildlife agencies.

The Role of Your License Fees

One of the main ways state wildlife agencies are funded is through hunting license fees. When you buy your hunting license or deer tags, you’re not only following the law—you’re also supporting conservation efforts directly. These fees fund everything from habitat restoration to wildlife management programs. The critical thing to understand is that, by law, these funds are supposed to stay within the state wildlife agency’s budget and cannot be diverted to other areas of the state’s general fund.

The Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act

Another key pillar of funding for wildlife conservation is the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act, which was passed in 1937. This federal law imposes an excise tax on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment, with the proceeds directed toward wildlife conservation. The funds generated from hunting license fees, along with Pittman-Robertson funds, can only be used for wildlife conservation. This ensures that even if lawmakers try to divert money elsewhere, these funds remain dedicated to preserving wildlife and habitats.

How the Pittman-Robertson Tax Works

The funds raised by Pittman-Robertson are significant. These excise taxes apply to manufacturers of firearms, ammunition, and related equipment, meaning recreational shooters also contribute, even if they’re not hunters. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service oversees these funds and allocates them for various conservation projects, including:

  • Program Administration: Overseeing conservation initiatives.
  • Multistate Conservation Grants: Funding joint projects across states.
  • Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation (R3) Grants: Promoting new hunters and retaining existing ones.
  • Hunter Education and Safety Grants: Supporting safe hunting practices.
  • Wildlife Restoration Grants: Funding habitat restoration and species recovery.

The funds are distributed based on each state’s land area and the number of paid hunting license holders, which means that when hunters purchase their licenses, they directly influence how much funding their state wildlife agency receives.

Other Sources of Funding

While license fees and Pittman-Robertson funds are crucial, many states also rely on other financial sources. Some states, like Missouri, have conservation sales taxes that provide additional funds for wildlife conservation. In 2021 alone, Missouri’s conservation sales tax generated over $133 million. Additionally, revenue from oil and gas leases, as well as land-use rights, can also contribute to the budget of state wildlife agencies.

Sustaining Conservation for the Future

The financial support for state wildlife agencies is a combination of federal excise taxes, hunting license fees, and other funding sources. Together, they help wildlife agencies protect and restore habitats, manage wildlife populations, and ensure that hunting can continue sustainably. But with increasing pressure from anti-conservation legislation, it’s essential for us as hunters to remain vigilant.

The National Deer Association is actively monitoring state legislation and keeping members informed about potential threats to wildlife management funding. To stay up to date on the latest developments in your state, be sure to sign up for our action alert emails. By staying informed and involved, we can help protect the future of wildlife conservation and ensure that deer hunters continue to have access to healthy and sustainable hunting opportunities. 

About Catherine Appling-Pooler: